Medrecords AI for med mal reviewers: what it does and does not do
Short version: Medrecords AI is AI medical record review software for physicians: it turns a record file into a page-cited chronology and summary, and drafts reports from your notes. We make it, and this site is ours. For a standard-of-care review it fits the timeline, the record questions and the missing-records list. It does not search the medical literature, and it does not decide whether care met the standard.
Limits: We read each product's own web pages on 2026-11-12 and did not upload records to any of them, ours included. Prices, plans and features change, and nothing here is legal advice or a substitute for your own clinical judgment.
What it does in a med mal review
Facts below come from the Medrecords AI pricing page and its published llms.txt, read on 2026-11-12.
- Reads the whole production: PDFs, scans, handwriting, Word files and DICOM imaging, with exact duplicate pages removed before billing.
- Builds a page-cited chronology: every line links back to its source page. See the chronology page.
- Answers questions about the file with the page each answer came from.
- Lists records the file mentions but does not contain: visits, providers and date ranges that should exist. See missing-records identification.
- Shows near-duplicate pages that differ side by side, which is where late amendments and addenda tend to show up.
- Has a Medical Malpractice case type, and birth injury files run under it with the mother's and the baby's records in 1 case. The med mal help guide walks through setup, gaps, tracing the care and reports.
- Drafts standard-of-care, causation and merit reports from your notes in your format. You review, edit and sign every one.
What it costs
| Item | Price as published on 2026-11-12 |
|---|---|
| Pages | 10 cents per deduplicated page; 8 cents per page at 100,000 credits; 5 cents per page at 500,000 credits. Exact duplicates are never charged. |
| Reports | $10 a report (100 credits) |
| Subscription, seats, setup | None. Credits do not expire. |
| Trial | 7 days on 1 case, up to 1,000 pages, no card, after you book a demo |
| Example | A 1,847-page file after duplicates bills $184.70 |
Speed: about 1 hour per case. Security: SOC 2 and HIPAA, a BAA at signup, and customer records never train a model.
What it does not do
- It does not answer from medical literature or guidelines. Use a literature tool for that; see the causation page.
- It does not tell you which guideline edition was in force on the date of care.
- It does not judge whether care met the standard, or whether a delay caused the harm. Those opinions are yours.
- It does not retrieve records from providers. It analyzes records you already have.
- It does not compute every result-to-response interval for you. The med mal guide describes tracing them as a method you run.
- It cannot flag records nobody mentioned, such as pager logs or the EHR audit trail. Use our checklist for those.
- There is no self-serve public API.
When to pick something else
- You review 1 or 2 files a year and the firm already runs a chronology tool: check their export instead of paying for a second tool.
- You want a free record platform: Superinsight offers one to licensed med-legal physicians.
- Price per page is the deciding factor: Dodonai publishes a lower rate on its standard summaries.
- You mostly ask questions of the file and want a flat fee: Hathr.AI is $47 a month with a BAA.
- Your questions are about the literature, not the chart: OpenEvidence, Consensus or Elicit.
Sources for each alternative are on the tools page.
Try it on a closed case
The fairest test is a closed review you know well. Run it through, then count the time stamps it got wrong in the critical window and the referenced records it failed to list. Book a demo to start the 7-day trial on 1 case.