AI tools for standard-of-care review, compared by task
Short version: 24 products in 4 groups. Record tools (Medrecords AI, Wisedocs, Dodonai, Anytime AI, Eve, Superinsight, Supio, DigitalOwl) read the chart; 4 of them state that each line cites a page. Literature tools (OpenEvidence, UpToDate Expert AI, ClinicalKey AI, Consensus, Elicit, PubMed and others) answer guideline and causation questions. General assistants under a BAA help with drafting. Consumer chatbots never get chart pages. Every fact below comes from the maker's own page, read on the date in the last column.
Limits: We read each product's own web pages on 2026-11-12 and did not upload records to any of them, ours included. Prices, plans and features change, and nothing here is legal advice or a substitute for your own clinical judgment.
Picks by reviewer type
| If you are | Start with | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A physician who reviews 1 or 2 med mal files a year | Whatever the retaining firm already runs, plus OpenEvidence or ChatGPT for Clinicians for literature | Ask the firm for the chronology export with page links. You check it; you do not need your own subscription. |
| A reviewer who wants a free record tool | Superinsight's platform for med-legal physicians | It says licensed physicians doing med-legal work get it free. It also refers experts to firms, so ask how your cases and data are used. |
| A reviewer with steady volume who wants to own the file | A per-page record tool: Medrecords AI (ours) or Dodonai | You pay for pages you upload, with no seat. Dodonai's published per-page rate is lower; compare on 1 real file. |
| A reviewer who mostly asks questions of the file | Hathr.AI | Flat $47 a month with a BAA and no per-page fee, per its pricing page. |
| A hospital peer review or risk team | A record tool with a BAA, plus the office suite you already cover (Microsoft 365 Copilot or Gemini in Workspace) for drafting | The BAA you already have with Microsoft or Google covers the AI features on their lists. |
The full table, as of 2026-11-12
"Not stated" means the pages we read did not say; it does not mean the product lacks the feature. Rows marked "network's capture of the same date" were read from copies saved by another site in this network on 2026-11-12.
| Product | Group | Review tasks | BAA or HIPAA | Citations | Published price | Sold mainly to | Source, captured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medrecords AI (ours) See our product page | Record tool | Timeline, missing records, record Q&A, report drafts from your notes | Yes: BAA signed at signup; SOC 2 and HIPAA; records never train a model | Every output line cites its source page | 10 cents per deduplicated page; 8 cents at 100,000 credits; 5 cents at 500,000; a report is $10; 7-day, 1-case trial up to 1,000 pages after a demo | Physician reviewers, hospital risk teams, IME and QME clinics, insurers, law firms | medrecords.ai/pricing.md and llms.txt, 2026-11-12 |
| Wisedocs Says it handles cases over 100,000 pages | Record tool | Timeline, large files | Not stated on the med mal page read | Chronologies stated; page links not stated on that page | Not published (book a demo) | Claims, legal and medical review teams | www.wisedocs.ai/use-cases/medical-malpractice, 2026-11-12 |
| Dodonai | Record tool | Timeline, filtering by provider and event | Yes: signed BAAs before the first upload; SOC 2 | Every chronology entry linked to the underlying record | $25 a month billed yearly ($300) for 4,800 credits; $0.063 a page for standard summaries on that plan; 7-day, 100-page trial | Law firms | www.dodon.ai/practice-areas/medical-malpractice, www.dodon.ai/pricing, 2026-11-12 |
| Anytime AI Also drafts demands and discovery | Record tool | Minute-level timeline, vital-sign trends | States SOC 2 and HIPAA; BAA not stated on the page read | Every entry linked to its source page | Not on the page read | Plaintiff med mal firms | www.anytimeai.ai/practice-areas/medical-malpractice-litigation, 2026-11-12 |
| Eve Says it handles files of 30,000 pages | Record tool | Chronology, standard-of-care analysis | Not stated on the page read | Not stated on the page read | "Roughly $350 per case" | Plaintiff med mal firms | www.eve.legal/practice-area/medical-malpractice, 2026-11-12 |
| Superinsight Also refers expert witnesses to firms; ask how cases and data are shared | Record tool | Timeline, inconsistencies, missing records | Yes: BAA countersigned before the first upload | Every entry quoted and cited to exhibit and page | Free chronology for law firms; plans from $250 a month; free platform for licensed med-legal physicians | Law firms; med-legal physicians | www.superinsight.ai/medical-malpractice.html, www.superinsight.ai, 2026-11-12 |
| Hathr.AI Runs Claude models in AWS GovCloud; says it has no SOC 2 report | HIPAA AI assistant | Questions over a full production | Yes: BAA included from $47 a month | Page citation on each answer, per its med mal guide | $47 a month; 7-day trial | Healthcare and legal teams | www.hathr.ai/pricing, www.hathr.ai/blogs/ai-for-medical-malpractice-and-disability-lawyers, 2026-11-12 |
| Supio | Record tool | Chronologies and demands | States HIPAA, GDPR and SOC 2 Type 2 | Not stated on the page read | Not published | Personal injury and mass tort firms | www.supio.com, 2026-11-12 |
| DigitalOwl Lists medical malpractice under its legal use cases | Record tool | Record summaries and chat | Not stated on the page read | Not stated on the page read | Not published; self-serve plan for legal under 30,000 pages a month | Insurers and law firms | www.digitalowl.com, 2026-11-12 |
| MOS Medical Record Reviews Uses DeepKnit AI's ReviewGenX plus a human QA team | Service with AI | Outsourced chronologies and summaries | Says its upload platform is HIPAA-compliant | Not stated on the page read | Not published; free trial offered | Attorneys | www.mosmedicalrecordreview.com/ai-powered-medical-record-review-for-attorneys, 2026-11-12 |
| OpenEvidence | Literature tool | Guideline and causation questions | Yes: covered entities may send PHI under its standard BAA; SOC 2 Type II | Citations to published literature | Free for US clinicians, per its search listing | Clinicians | www.openevidence.com, www.openevidence.com/security, 2026-11-12 |
| ChatGPT for Clinicians | Literature and drafting assistant | Framing questions, literature, drafting | Yes: individual BAA available | Clinical search with citations to medical sources, not to pages of your file | Free for verified US clinicians with an NPI | Individual clinicians | help.openai.com/articles/20001202, 2026-11-12 |
| ChatGPT for Healthcare Read in the network's capture of the same date | General assistant | Office-wide drafting under 1 contract | Yes: organization BAA | Not a file-citation tool | Not on the help page read | Health organizations | help.openai.com/articles/20001046, 2026-11-12 |
| Doximity Ask Read in the network's capture of the same date | Literature and drafting assistant | Clinical questions, drafting | Says it is HIPAA-compliant | Referenced, evidence-based answers; file upload supported | Free with a verified Doximity account | Clinicians | support.doximity.com/hc/en-us/articles/55381817186195-Doximity-Ask-FAQs, 2026-11-12 |
| UpToDate Expert AI Answers from current UpToDate content, not past editions | Literature tool | Guideline questions | Not stated on the page read | Inline links to UpToDate topics | Institutional or individual subscription; select markets | Clinicians and institutions | www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/uptodate-expert-ai, 2026-11-12 |
| ClinicalKey AI Says its content sources update daily | Literature tool | Guideline and evidence questions | "Built to be HIPAA-compliant" (footnoted) | Linked citations to supporting evidence | 90-day free trial | Clinicians | www.elsevier.com/products/clinicalkey/clinicalkey-ai, 2026-11-12 |
| Medscape AI search | Literature tool | Quick clinical questions | Not stated on the page read | Not stated on the page read | Free, per its search listing | Clinicians | www.medscape.com/ai-search, 2026-11-12 |
| Consensus 250M+ papers; filter to about 50,000 clinical guidelines | Literature tool | Causation literature | Not relevant if you send no PHI | Answers drawn from research papers | Not captured | Researchers and clinicians | consensus.app, 2026-11-12 |
| Elicit 138 million papers and 545,000 trials | Literature tool | Causation literature, effect-size tables | Not relevant if you send no PHI | Sentence-level citations | Not captured | Researchers | elicit.com, 2026-11-12 |
| PubMed Run by the National Library of Medicine | Literature index | Confirming every citation | No PHI involved | It is the citation source | Free | Everyone | pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 2026-11-12 |
| Claude Enterprise with HIPAA settings Read in the network's capture of the same date | General assistant | Drafting, short documents under a BAA | Yes, once the owner turns on HIPAA settings and accepts the BAA; beta features excluded | Not a file-citation tool | $20 a seat a month billed yearly, 20 seat minimum, plus usage | Larger groups | privacy.claude.com/en/articles/8114513-business-associate-agreements-baa-for-commercial-customers, claude.com/pricing, 2026-11-12 |
| Microsoft 365 Copilot (work account) Read in the network's capture of the same date | General assistant | Drafting inside Word and Outlook | Yes, through Microsoft's HIPAA BAA for in-scope services | Not a file-citation tool | Part of Microsoft 365 business plans | Offices already on Microsoft 365 | learn.microsoft.com/en-us/compliance/regulatory/offering-hipaa-hitech, 2026-11-12 |
| Gemini in Google Workspace Read in the network's capture of the same date | General assistant | Drafting inside Docs and Gmail | Yes, under the Workspace BAA an admin accepts | Not a file-citation tool | Part of Workspace plans | Offices already on Workspace | support.google.com/a/answer/3407054, workspace.google.com/terms/2015/1/hipaa_functionality, 2026-11-12 |
| ChatGPT Free, Plus or Pro Fine for questions with no patient data; never for chart pages | Consumer chatbot | None with chart pages | No BAA on consumer plans | No page citations to your file | Free to paid personal plans | Consumers | help.openai.com/articles/20001069, 2026-11-12 |
How the 4 groups fit the review
- Record tools read the production, remove duplicates, build the chronology and answer questions with page citations. Use them for the timeline, candidate deviations and the missing-records pass. Most are sold to law firms, so a retained reviewer often receives their output rather than buying them.
- Literature tools answer from published sources. Use them for guideline and causation questions, with no patient identifiers, and pull the edition in force on the date of care yourself.
- General assistants under a BAA help draft and edit. They are not built to cite pages of a 3,000-page file. Use them for your own notes and short documents.
- Consumer chatbots have no BAA. Use them only for questions with no patient data in them.
Questions to ask any record tool before the first upload
- Will you sign a BAA with me, as an individual physician, before I upload?
- Does every line of the chronology link to a page I can open?
- Which time does each entry use: the time of the event, or the time it was filed?
- Do you flag late entries, addenda and text copied from earlier notes?
- Do you read flowsheets, the MAR and monitor strips that arrive as scans?
- Do you list records the file mentions but does not contain?
- Do you bill by uploaded page, by deduplicated page, by case or by seat?
- Do you use my files to train a model, and when are they deleted?
Then run 1 closed case you know well through it. Count the time stamps it got wrong in the critical window, not the number of pages it read.
What we left out, and why
- Ambient scribes record visits; they do not read a litigation file.
- Legal research platforms answer law questions for attorneys; the causation standard is the attorney's question to answer.
- Products with no public page on med mal or record review, since we could not date a fact for them.
Makers can send corrections to aj@medrecords.ai. How we gather and check facts is on the methodology page.